[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 02/17/2000 12:09:17 PM
>[ On Wednesday, February 16, 2000 at 21:22:22 (-0800), Jerry Nairn wrote: ]
>> Subject: RE: let's all take turns ranting
>>
>> There it is. And the three supporting statements are true. The flaw in this
>> logic is that statements 1 and 3 depend on different definitions of "cvs
>> managed directory." They can't both be true at the same time, because some
>
>You're absolutely wrong. They are both true at the same time. They
>*MUST* be!
According to your statement, "cvs edit file" within a directory with no CVS
admin subdirectory but whose parent directory has a CVS admin subdirectory will
work. It does not. It also doesn't work for "cvs up file" under the same
situation. I think this was gone over before.
>> cvs commands will not work in a directory with no CVS admin directory.
>
>That's the fatal flaw in your argument. You're not paying attention to
>the *purpose* of the command at the same time. This has been pointed
>out numerous times before too.
Greg, according to what I've read, you contradict yourself several times.
Noel
