Moon, moin again

Thomas Wichmann writes:
 > 
 > Moin, moin
 > 
 > I have a strange problem with "CVS 1.10  `Halibut' (client/server)".
 > It is a not set CVSROOT variable problem on Solaris 7.
 > 
 > Everything seems to work fine except remote access from 
 > a different nor the same machine using pserver.
 > 
 > In  /etc/inetd.conf  I have
 > 
 > cvspserver  stream  tcp  nowait  root  /usr/local/bin/cvs --allow-root=/data1/cvs 
 >pserver
 > 

I am sorry for my confusing problem report. I have tried so many
settings and in the end I have sent the wrong version.

I tried also the correct version 

cvspserver  stream  tcp  nowait  root  /usr/local/bin/cvs cvs --allow-root=/data1/cvs 
pserver

but the result is the same. This is strange.

My next steps are 

 - talking with our Solaris administrator, if something might be wrong 
   with the network settings
 - trying a newer CVS version

 > and in /etc/services 
 > 
 > cvspserver      2401/tcp                        # CVS authentification (by Wichmann)
 > 
 > In /data1/cvs/CVSROOT/passwd I have an account for "wichmann".
 > 
 > That is, what happens:
 > 
 > bash$ export CVSROOT=:pserver:wichmann@bpdev1-neu:/data1/cvs
 > bash$ cvs login
 > (Logging in to wichmann@bpdev1-neu)
 > CVS password: 
 > cvs [login aborted]: unrecognized auth response from bpdev1-neu: cvs
 > pserver: No CVSROOT specified!  Please use the `-d' option
 > 
 > 
 > Ok and tried it different
 > 
 > 
 > bash$ cvs -d :pserver:wichmann@bpdev1-neu:/data1/cvs login
 > (Logging in to wichmann@bpdev1-neu)
 > CVS password: 
 > cvs [login aborted]: unrecognized auth response from bpdev1-neu: cvs
 > pserver: No CVSROOT specified!  Please use the `-d' option
 > 
 > Looks like the error message is generated from the CVS server
 > but how can I set a variable for the server part?
 > 
 > If I try to use CVS locally on the machine everything works as 
 > expected. I have done a similar installation and setup on
 > Debian 2.1 and have had no problems.
 > 
 > I don't understand this behavior.
 > 
 > Can someone help me out of this?
 > 
 > 
 > Thomas
 > 

Thanks Thomas

Reply via email to