Re: cvs up -C bug(s)

[Noel L Yap]

[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/08/2000 04:24:19 PM
>> It seems you've been more thorough than I have.  Looking at it another way,
"cvs
>> up -C file"  should be equivalent to "cvs up -p -r <base-rev> file >file".
If
>> other flags (eg "-j") were specified, the command should be equivalent to
"cvs
>> up -p -r <base-rev> file >file; cvs up <other-flags> file".
>
>That's the parallelism I was looking for.  I agree completely.

I forgot to mention (but I think it was implied) that the two-part statement
should conceptually be atomic.

Noel