On Friday, April 28, "Andy Glew" wrote:
> 
> How can one truly implement an atomic multifile
> commit in CVS?  In the sense that only a consistent
> set of files is made available for others to pick up,
> even in the presence of (some) errors during checkin?

With tags you can come as close to this as you wish,
modulo some conflict resolution issues that would need
to be worked out using some operational proceedures...

--Toby.


Reply via email to