I wrote:
> Greg Woods wrote:
[...]
> OK, so exactly how is this [my .trunk patch] different from "-r1"?
> Seems like it's the
> same thing to me, which means it's an awful waste of coding effort,
> not
> to mention the extra typing necessary to use it... ;-)
> [smc]
>
> ".trunk" has the possibility of handling the case where
> sombody has done "cvs commit -r2 foo", (though I haven't
> tested that case.)
>
[smc] I just tried it.
echo x > x
cvs add x
cvs commit -m x x
cvs tag one x
echo 2 >> x
cvs commit -r 2.1 -m x x
cvs diff -r one -r1 x
(no output, that is, the diffs between rev 1.1 and rev 1.1 )
cvs diff -r one -r.trunk x
(you get the diffs between rev 1.1 and rev 2.1)
I'll be adding such a case to sanity.sh in my patch later.
(Does this justify the effort? who am I to say?)
-- steve
- ".trunk" patch refinement Stephen Cameron
- Re: ".trunk" patch refinement Greg A. Woods
- Re: ".trunk" patch refinement Michael Richardson
- Re: ".trunk" patch refinement John P Cavanaugh
- Re: ".trunk" patch refinement Greg A. Woods
- Re HEAD (was Re: ".trunk" pa... Mike Little
- Re: ".trunk" patch refinement Stephen Cameron
- RE: ".trunk" patch refinement Cameron, Steve
- RE: ".trunk" patch refinement Cameron, Steve
- RE: ".trunk" patch refinement Mike Little
- RE: ".trunk" patch refinement Greg A. Woods
- Re: ".trunk" patch refinement Eric Siegerman
- RE: ".trunk" patch refinement J. Cone
- RE: ".trunk" patch refinemen... Greg A. Woods
- Anybody converted VSS history to ... Laine Stump
- RE: ".trunk" patch refinement Rex_Jolliff
- Re: ".trunk" patch refinement David Thornley
- Re: ".trunk" patch refinement Greg A. Woods
- Re: ".trunk" patch refinemen... David Thornley
