David Thornley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Either way, any technique that assumes that all main trunk development > is on rev numbers 1.* is useless to me, and probably to quite a few > people. And it's quite possible to get into that state without any misuse of CVS at any point. It's worth remembering that a lot of us are using CVS repositories formed from imported RCS files, and using different rev numbers with RCS is extremely common. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
- RE: ".trunk" patch refinement Mike Little
- RE: ".trunk" patch refinement Greg A. Woods
- Re: ".trunk" patch refinement Eric Siegerman
- RE: ".trunk" patch refinement J. Cone
- RE: ".trunk" patch refinement Greg A. Woods
- Anybody converted VSS history to CVS? Laine Stump
- RE: ".trunk" patch refinement Rex_Jolliff
- Re: ".trunk" patch refinement David Thornley
- Re: ".trunk" patch refinement Greg A. Woods
- Re: ".trunk" patch refinement David Thornley
- Re: ".trunk" patch refinement Russ Allbery
- Re: ".trunk" patch refinement John Macdonald
- Re: ".trunk" patch refinement Eivind Eklund
- When is it appropriate to update a major version n... Mike Jellison
- Re: When is it appropriate to update a major v... Larry Jones
- Re: When is it appropriate to update a major v... Laird Nelson
- Re: When is it appropriate to update a maj... Greg A. Woods
- RE: ".trunk" patch refinement Cameron, Steve
- RE: ".trunk" patch refinement Stephen Rasku
- Re: ".trunk" patch refinement John Macdonald
- RE: ".trunk" patch refinement Cameron, Steve
