On Fri, 7 Jul 2000, sean dreilinger wrote:
> --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Carlos Costa Portela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello, all!
>
> Hi Carlos:
>
> > Here at demasiado.com, we're using cvs to help us develop our
> > website.
>
> cool. how are you presently using cvs?
We aren't using branches. Each one of us have the working copy
under his UserDir apache, so we can see our modifications in the ~user
directory (http://172.16.100.99/~ccosta/).
Of course, when we see that all runs ok, we commit the files so
everybody can update his copy.
> which way is the classical way?
I am referring to have a stable version and an unstable version.
>
> i think one of the other suggestions for tagging and branching in this
> thread might interest you, especially combined with a setup for
> staging and development (not cvs-specific).
>
> so what did you end up doing? still deciding?
I am noticing that each development group uses CVS differently,
depending on their own needs.
The main problem we have is developing small and large projects
simultaneously.
Small Project - (1, 2 hours)- small changes in the current on-line
version.
Big project - (1, 2 months) - new services in development.
So we are looking for a way to maintain and modify a current
version that allows us the freedom to make global (even experimental)
changes to the entire site in an "unstable" development version.
There are approximately 20 programmers that constanly need to
access and work on both the "current" and "unstable" versions at any time.
Thank you very much,
Carlos.
_______Carlos Costa Portela___________Web Developer - demasiado.com__
| www: http://ccp.servidores.net | email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|__T�dalas persoas maiores foron nenos antes, pero poucas se lembran__|
