That doesn't seem like a reasonable answer.  CVS should be able to handle
the intermediate files just fine. I can certainly imagine scenarios in which

one would want to put up sections of pre-compiled slowly-changing chunks of
code (for efficiency reasons). 

Is there a *Java-related* reason not to put .class and .jar files up in CVS?


-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Rasku [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2000 12:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Java class and jar files



>From: Annette Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Info-Cvs (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Java class and jar files
>Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 11:25:40 -0700
>X-Mailing-List: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archive/latest/18704
>
>Are there any special steps I need to take to put java class and jar 
files
>under CVS?
>

That is not recommended.  Just check in the source, not the generated 
files.

-- 
Stephen Rasku                   E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Software Engineer        Web:    http://www.tgivan.com/
TGI Technologies                        http://www.pop-star.net/

Reply via email to