Stephen Rasku wrote:

> I think perhaps you are speaking as a cvs developer here not a cvs
> user.  To me "cvs unedit" has a closer meaning in english for
> reverting files than "cvs update".  But I guess the "cvs update -C"
> isn't technically reverting files.  Its updating them and throwing
> away any local changes.  I would still like to see "cvs unedit"
> actually revert files (i.e. restore to the version you were editting
> instead of the latest version).

I agree.  It seems that the commands are named from the perspective of
the repository manager, not the user.

--Avi

=========  Avi Green :) (: www.sputnik7.com  =========
========     Unix S/A & System Specialist     ========
========  avi at sputnik7.com   212 217-1147  ========

Reply via email to