In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg A. Woods) writes:

> See the recent thread on BUGTRAQ where someone "exposed" the
> insecurities of cvspserver.

No.  That's *not* cvspserver problem.

First half is a general server problem not restricted to cvspserver
and last half is client problem.  They are not depended to cvspserver.

I found that proposed fix for former problem or similar one are
applied for sourceforge cvs server via ssh. (The result of
valid-requests doesn't have Checkin-prog or Update-prog.)

I think cvs distribution should have similar fix.  You may think it is
meaningless because cvs server with write access may provide shell
access by definition, though.

Sourceforge try to forbid executing programs other than cvs command on
cvs server machine.  Why cvs distribution shouldn't do similar
challenge?
-- 
Tanaka Akira

Reply via email to