pei1 wrote:
>
> Dear Sir / Madam:
>
> We decided to bring the major revision number up to 3.1 so I did
>
> a command:
>
> cvs commit -m "Change major revision number." -r 3.1
>
This is almost certainly the wrong thing to do. It is best to
leave the revision numbers alone, using them only as identifiers.
If you want to list files as revision 3.1, the right thing to
do is to assign a tag:
cvs tag REV_3_1
or some such. Any reference to a group of files should be to a tag,
not to a revision number.
> The wierd thing is:
>
> Some files are updated to 3.1, but there are files which still
>
> stay at old version number. And I checked and there seems no
>
Were some of the files changed, and some not? Without looking at
the docs, I'd expect changed files to be committed with the
specified rev number, and unchanged files to be left untouched.
