Re: cvs ls wrapper solution

[Larry Jones]

Eugene Kramer writes:
> 
> I guess, it will be practical to use 1971 unless someone's timezone is off
> by a year :-) Folks, who used RCS before 1971 are out of luck as well. Here
> is a better featured version:

What's wrong with "1970-01-01 UTC"?

-Larry Jones

Mom must've put my cape in the wrong drawer. -- Calvin