On Sun, 10 Sep 2000 10:09:09 +0200 Guus Leeuw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>What I would suggest, but I might miss the bullseye way, is that you
>include A B and C just as toplevel modules, like M, and your build system
>(make or some such) takes care of the moves...
Sorry, yes, I should have mentioned that this was my backup position. I was
just hoping that there was something more direct and less error-prone.
>Or even, your build system, detecting A is not there, but needed, checks
>it out.
Actually, the reverse is true. If the build system detects that the submodule
has been checked out, it automatically enables the code that uses it.
Hope this helps,
-- Greg Noel, retired UNIX guru
