At 2000-09-12 14:24 -0400, Eric Siegerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Indeed, I'm glad to have someone finally confirm my theory that
>"The Cederqvist" and cvs.info are one and the same -- and I've
>been using CVS since version 1.2 or 1.3.
>Technical terminology is one thing; jargon for its own sake risks
>the charge of willful obscurantism.
On the other hand, I'm a total newbie to CVS, but one of the first things I
found out was what the "Cederqvist" was.
Of course, that doesn't mean to say that it should be referred to as the
"Cederqvist" in official documentation (without explanation, at least).
In casual conversation, I see no harm in calling it the "Cederqvist" (and,
in fact, it has positive benefits). If someone doesn't know what it is,
they can always ask, in that case.
David Trudgett
