--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Guus Leeuw) wrote:
> >  -----Original Message-----
> >  From: Fabrice Gautier [mailto:gautier@e...]
> >  cvs -q diff -u -r > mypatch.txt 
> 
> You should read the Cederqvist manual.
> 
> Try the command rdiff and you probably want to forget about
> the -u option (unidiff, which is not supported by old patch
> programs).

Well, I've read it quite a bit....especially where there was diff or 
rdiff mentionned. 

And rdiff always ask me for a module name and a revision number when 
I just want a diff between a file in my working directory and a the 
remote one it is based on. 

A bit of Cederqvist readings about rdiff:
"Like the diff command, except it operates directly in the repository"
Well, you got it...

But anyway, the problem is a bug corrected in cvs 1.10.3

And reading Cederqvist didn't help to know why when you use a 1.10.5 
client you still see the bug - the obvious answer I didn't figured 
out was that the bug is in the server, and Cderqvist doesn't give a 
clue about the diff being processed by the server (even on the 
working file)

How and still another question I didn't see the answer in the 
Cederqvist is how I produce a patch with a new file (ie: a file 
present in the working copy but not the repository). May be it's 
another bug of the cvs server, but -N doesn't work.

So If you have the page in the Cederqvist where there is an 
answer....>:->

To be more general I don't think the Cederqvist handle the situation 
of people who have only read access to the repository (at least the 
free chapters).

Thanks

Fabrice



Reply via email to