[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > VMS will do the right thing if you call exit, either with the #defines > or with 0. Returning from main, on the other hand, ...seems to do the right thing as well (i.e., 0 gets mapped to 1, any other value is returned as-is). Why do you say "on the other hand"? -Larry Jones Apparently I was misinformed. -- Calvin _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
- Re: incorrect return code on vms... Donald Sharp
- Re: incorrect return code on vms... David H. Thornley
- Re: incorrect return code on vms... Noel L Yap
- Re: incorrect return code on vms... Larry Jones
- Re: incorrect return code on vms... Derek R. Price
- Re: incorrect return code on vms... Larry Jones
- Re: incorrect return code on vms... Derek R. Price
- Re: incorrect return code on vms... David H. Thornley
- Re: incorrect return code on vms... Larry Jones
- Re: incorrect return code on vms... Rex_Jolliff
- Re: incorrect return code on vms... Larry Jones
- Re: incorrect return code on vms... Rex_Jolliff
- Re: incorrect return code on vms... Gerhard den Hollander
