I was thinking. Many people have told me this is a kludge. Other vc
systems support rollback. Is support for rollback (cvs rollback
file.c -v ?) worth diving into the cvs source? A few people have told me it
would be productive, but they didn't want to touch the cvs code.
?????
>>>>> "Eric" == Eric Siegerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2000 at 08:16:49PM -0500, Nick Papadonis wrote:
>> Anyone know of a better/easier way of rolling back to a
>> previous file version other then the following sequence:
>>
>> cvs update -rver file.c mv file.c file.c.older cvs update -A
>> file.c mv file.c.older file.c cvs commit -m "reverting to prev
>> version" file.c
> Yeah: cvs update -p -rver file.c >file.c cvs commit -m
> "reverting to prev version" file.c
> Still a kludge, but a shorter one :-)
> --
> | | /\ |-_|/ > Eric Siegerman, Toronto, Ont. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> | | / Nobody ever got fired for buying Microsoft -- but they
> could get fired for relying on Microsoft. - Chris Garrigues
> _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing
> list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
--
- Nick
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
