Oh, I forgot to say that, in the course of fixing cvs-1.10.8 deficiencies, I
broke some stuff. This stuff was fixed by the patches described as "various ...
bugs fixed".
Noel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2001.01.15 02:45:55
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Noel L Yap)
Subject: cvs editors bug? renegade cvs or 1.11?
I'm in charge of (some sort of) CVS support for a team of coders.
They report some strange behaviors regarding cvs edit/unedit.
(the list of editors is not in sync with reality)
I'm watching this ML for some times and never noticed anything on this topic
(edit bug)
I assumed that the problem was not due to cvs but to ... errr... users ;)
But today I checked for the renegade CVS on source forge and found a lot of
patches like:
- cvs edit fixed to save correct working directory
- "cvs edit" fixed so wd are purely absolute
- various "cvs edit" & "cvs unedit" bugs fixed
- ...
I'm running the 1.11 server (the problems were also reported for 1.10.8)
What must I conclude?
The rcvs bug fixes are related to code specific to rcvs branch?
Or do they also apply to pure cvs ? And is the 1.11 already patched?
Thanx for any hint on this topic
Olivier
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as
an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument
or as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data
and other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and
are subject to change without notice. Any comments or statements made herein
do not necessarily reflect those of J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. Incorporated, its
subsidiaries and affiliates.
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
