[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> So, how does this really work? If User A and User B both checkout
> the current revision (1.4), and both make changes, and User A commits
> his changes (making revision 1.5), what happens when User B tries to
> commit her changes?
bash-2.02$ cvs commit foo1
cvs commit: Up-to-date check failed for `foo1'
cvs [commit aborted]: correct above errors first!
> In my testing, I just get a revision 1.6, with
> the 1.5 changes "lost", i.e. not included in 1.6. Is the doc wrong
> about how this works?
No, something's wrong with how you're testing. If you tell us step-by-
step exactly what you're doing, we'll probably be able to figure out
what.
-Larry Jones
Rats. I can't tell my gum from my Silly Putty. -- Calvin
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
