Thus said Harald Kucharek on Wed, 28 Mar 2001 09:38:40 +0200:
> Well, I don't think there is any question about it. It can
> only be attributable to human error. This sort of thing has
Oh, you won't get any argument from me here...
> Let me put it this way, Mr. Bradford. The CVS system is the
> most reliable software ever made. No CVS server has ever made
> a mistake or distorted information. They are are all, by any practical
> definition of the words, foolproof and incapable of error.
Like I said, I have no qualms with anything you said. I personally
think CVS is truly one of the greatest pieces of software, however,
trying to convince others that have never used it before, that suddenly
attribute all their problems to it, is difficult and I need reasons. I
can't just simply say ``you screwed up.'' I know it's due to human
error, but need to make others see this light. :-)
I understand how CVS works for the most part since I have used RCS,
diff and friends quite extensively, but haven't ever encountered this
situation in my usage (maybe that's because I know how to use it) of
CVS.
Andy
--
[-----------[system uptime]--------------------------------------------]
1:43am up 42 days, 1:46, 4 users, load average: 1.06, 1.06, 1.04
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
