Paul Sander wrote:
> Have you looked into the way that RCS works? It does not replace the
> RCS files in-place; it makes a modified copy in its lock file, and then
> renames the lock file on top of the original.
Yeah, I knew that. Thanks.
> I've used this method with great success for years, with concurrent
> commits, under the conditions you state. There have been no corruptions
> of any sandbox to date.
How do you accomplish this? Do you have a patch?
Does anyone know what happens if you put '-n' on the cvspserver line in
inetd.conf? Sounds neat, but I suppose this might not do the trick for a repo
on a local CD-ROM.
Derek
--
Derek Price CVS Solutions Architect ( http://CVSHome.org )
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] CollabNet ( http://collab.net )
--
116. (A)bort, (R)etry, (P)retend this never happened...
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
