There are obviously some areas where CVS can be improved - no doubt.
But if you compare it to some other commercial SCM system that I'm
familiar with, e.g. ENVY that comes with IBM's Visual Age for Java or
PVCS, it is much, much superior. If ClearCase were free I'm pretty sure
that I would choose it over CVS, but it's anything buy free. The
Subversion project is interesting, but they will no doubt barrow a lot
from CVS, if not code, then at least design and functionality. The
bottom line is that you can do a lot, lot worse than CVS, even if you
choose a commercial tool. My two cents...
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gary.heuston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 1:04 PM
> To: info-cvs
> Subject: CVS bashing?
>
>
> Someone brought up a site on another mailing list about CVS and its
> limitations and was citing this as a reason to not use
> CVS...what do you
> all think about this? Some of this stuff I have personally witmessed
> (i.e. large binary file problem, no directory versioning) but I'm
> curious as to others opinions...
>
> http://www.snuffybear.com/scm_grind_cvs.htm
>
> Gary
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Info-cvs mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
>
