Much the same as I got this message before I got Larry's.
(I hate it when I get the answer before the question Don't you, makes me
wonder what the H they are talking about. I wonder if Anthony is psychic?
:-)
MEE
-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Rabaa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: May 9, 2001 3:14 PM
To: Larry Jones; Donald Sharp
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Suspicious email message intercepted
I guess I was lucky, I received two warnings before the homepage e-mail
actually arrived ;-)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Larry Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Donald Sharp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 2:47 PM
Subject: Re: Suspicious email message intercepted
> Donald Sharp writes:
> >
> > Actually it's a fairly good thing to send out the warning email
> > to a list. People might thus avoid getting the virus.
>
> No, it's not. Since the warning almost always arrives *after* the
> original message, it's pretty much useless. And, it's extremely
> impolite -- we don't need a dozen warnings for each such message.
>
> -Larry Jones
>
> Do you think God lets you plea bargain? -- Calvin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Info-cvs mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
