On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 09:45:54PM +0200, Ferdinand Schaefer wrote:
> In my opinion Msword Documents need to be
> treated as binary files.
Correct. Which means the archive grows. And you can't easily track what
changes were made between documents.
Dump word.
Use TeX or roff.
mrc
--
Mike Castle Life is like a clock: You can work constantly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and be right all the time, or not work at all
www.netcom.com/~dalgoda/ and be right at least twice a day. -- mrc
We are all of us living in the shadow of Manhattan. -- Watchmen
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
- handling of MsWord-Documents in CVS ? Ferdinand Schaefer
- Re: handling of MsWord-Documents in CVS ? Mike Castle
- Re: handling of MsWord-Documents in CVS ? Christian Robottom Reis
- Re: handling of MsWord-Documents in C... Mike Castle
- RE: handling of MsWord-Documents in CVS ? Echlin, Michael
- Re: handling of MsWord-Documents in CVS ? Eric Siegerman
- RE: handling of MsWord-Documents in C... Patrick Lynch
- Re: handling of MsWord-Documents ... Todd Denniston
- RE: handling of MsWord-Documents in CVS ? Echlin, Michael
- RE: handling of MsWord-Documents in CVS ? Greg A. Woods
- RE: handling of MsWord-Documents in CVS ? Echlin, Michael
- RE: handling of MsWord-Documents in CVS ? Echlin, Michael
