[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Greg A. Woods) writes: > I find nothing whatsoever "awkward" about the remove/add scheme. It > works perfectly as far as I can tell. The awkwardness is in breaking > any pre-concieved and incorrect notions users might have about what a > rename operation actually is. It makes it more difficult to do a diff of a revision of the file pre-move with one that is post-move, especially with a frontend such as tkCVS, which presents you with a graphical representation of the file history, then allows you to click on the two revisions you want to diff. _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
- Newby : moving/renaming files loses version informati... Hondros, Constantine
- Re: Newby : moving/renaming files loses version ... Laine Stump
- RE: Newby : moving/renaming files loses version ... Richard Sharp
- RE: Newby : moving/renaming files loses version ... Hondros, Constantine
- RE: Newby : moving/renaming files loses version ... Thornley, David
- RE: Newby : moving/renaming files loses vers... Greg A. Woods
- Re: Newby : moving/renaming files loses ... Laine Stump
- Re: Newby : moving/renaming files lo... Greg A. Woods
- Re: Newby : moving/renaming fil... Laine Stump
- Re: Newby : moving/renaming fil... Tanaka Akira
- Re: Newby : moving/renaming... Greg A. Woods
- RE: Newby : moving/renaming files loses version ... Echlin, Michael
