"Roberts, Iwan(LIT)" wrote:
> IMHO I believe that the main problem with CVS is that assuming we replace
> "checkout" with "cvs edit" in the statement below, user A marks a file for
> edit, user B also marks the file for edit, user A gets a notification that
> user B is about to edit the file, but user B is not informed that user A has
> previously marked the file for edit, therefore one party is informed, but
> not the other. Is there a way for both parties to be notified ?
Some of the patches Noel mentioned are intended to prevent two non-determined
users from editing the same file at the same time. The editor information is
also available to anybody using the 'cvs watchers' command.
Derek
--
Derek Price CVS Solutions Architect ( http://CVSHome.org )
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] CollabNet ( http://collab.net )
--
"Bart Bucks" are not legal tender.
"Bart Bucks" are not legal tender.
"Bart Bucks" are not legal tender...
- Bart Simpson on chalkboard, _The Simpsons_
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
