On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 03:59:15PM -0400, Larry Jones wrote:
> Donald Sharp writes:
> >
> > I was just going to do it by hand( didn't realize that admin could do this ).
>
> That's what I was afraid of. :-)
Yep..
That's the reason I asked the question.
Fortunately for me if I do it in this manner the user has only created
this one branch after a import into the repository. So everthing
looks identical..
>
> > I think I can do a
> >
> > cvs admin -n<branch_name>:<branch_rev> <filenames>
> >
> > Where <branch_name> is the branch in question.
> > Where <branch_rev> is the revision number for the branch.
> >
> > is this correct?
>
> I think so. But note that the branch_rev is likely to be different for
> each file, so be careful. (Some commands won't even let you specify a
> numeric revision with more than one file -- I don't remember whether
> admin is one of them or not.)
I just tried using the admin -n command in a test repository. I'm getting:
donsharp-u5:27> cvs admin -nFOOZLE:1.5.0.2 bar
RCS file: /nfs/swtrf/repository/test/c/bar,v
cvs [admin aborted]: revision `1.5.0.2' does not exist
I know 1.5.0.2 doesn't exist, but that's the branch revision number...
Thoughts?
donald
>
> -Larry Jones
>
> Archaeologists have the most mind-numbing job on the planet. -- Calvin
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
