on Donnerstag, 14. Juni 2001 00:59 you wrote:
> What about the capabilities of commitinfo, loginfo, taginfo. I would
> imagine those must be limited on an NT server, since it won't have all
> the same commands available. (I'm just guessing though, as I've never
> run it on NT. It's something you should investigate though).
>
> Also, what about the more flexible remote administration (Of course
> that's and argument for Unix rather than NT in general, so presumably
> your admin has already chosen to ignore that point).
>
> And I would reiterate the point that CVSNT is a *port* of CVS, not
> just another platform that the main source can be built for. That
> means that there is a delay before new features/bugfixes in the main
> code find their way into cvsnt.
>
Yeah, those are very good points. I thought about loginfo etc. too, but I
don't think that those could be convincing arguments for my admin, but
anyway thanks for the hints. Maybe I'll convince him.
Thanks a lot and best regards from germany.
--
Mathias Meyer
mediaworx berlin AG
Fon: (0 30) 27 58 02 48
Fax: (0 30) 27 58 02 00
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
