Noel L Yap wrote:
> >Now there's the rub... it requires patches to get advisory locks. I'm
> >talking about baseline CVS, as shipped out-of-the-box. And, the patches
> >aren't necessarily kept up-to-date with the latest CVS.
>
> Yes, I would very much love seeing these patches as part of CVS proper. They're
> missing test and toc patches (and another volunteer will need to submit these).
> Once these are in, the patches'll have a bigger chance of being included.
Not counting any code/tests anybody decides to nitpick, they'd probably have a
pretty good chance. I haven't heard any rumblings in response to my repeated
threats to include the changes in the main tree if they came with doc, ChangeLogs,
and tests.
Derek
--
Derek Price CVS Solutions Architect ( http://CVSHome.org )
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] CollabNet ( http://collab.net )
--
Life in a vacuum sucks.
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
