CVS should handle Unicode as utf-8. I can't think of any reason why it would
not. Unicode (as utf-16) is probably a waste of time to support as anything
but binary.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Larry Jones
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 10:40 AM
To: Harald Kucharek
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Extended characters [Solved (well, sort of)]
Harald Kucharek writes:
>
> Q: Are there any plans for a Unicode-capable CVS?
Not that I know of. Are there any plans for a Unicode-capable RCS?
-Larry Jones
It's a Doofus Ignoramus! Our hero slowly reaches for his stun blaster!
-- Calvin
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
