IIRC, edit keeps track of edits on a per file basis. I think many things would have to change for it to track edits sn a per branch basis (eg What if the branch gets redefined? Some users would care about other branches. There might be others.)
Noel I seem to have encountered an oddity in CVS and I'm not sure whether this was an oversight on the part of CVS, or me :) ? Let's assume that you have a file foo.c, with a branch of Branch1. Now, say that a user has foo.c checked out in their workspace on Branch1 (cvs update -r Branch1 foo.c) and then edits it (cvs edit foo.c). Have a second user get the mainline version of foo.c (cvs update -A foo.c), and then runs the Editors list on it (cvs editors foo.c). Now does it make sense that the second user will see the 'edit' status of the first user even though the first user did the edit on the branch, and not on the mainline? This communication is for informational purposes only. It is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument or as an official confirmation of any transaction. All market prices, data and other information are not warranted as to completeness or accuracy and are subject to change without notice. Any comments or statements made herein do not necessarily reflect those of J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates. _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
