[ On Tuesday, December 18, 2001 at 20:00:54 (-0800), Paul Sander wrote: ]
> Subject: RE: Possible modifications to CVS.
>
> It's also a required feature if you're migrating from one well-organized
> structure to another, if you also require keeping the cumulative history
> of each file in one easy-to-find place.
Reorganisation can much more easily be done outside of the respective
version control tools, and then the history can be migrated intact.
It's just a matter of perspective.
> >If you organise your files first, and then put them into CVS, such a
> >capability is unnecessary and if poorly implemented would even get in
> >the way (in any number of possible ways).
>
> If poorly implemented...
Oh, come on Paul! Two other highly respected CVS experts have claimed
that it would be nearly impossible to graft on such a feature to the
existing CVS implementation. Thus how could it possibly not be poorly
implemented!?!?!?!?!
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Planix, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
