On Friday, 14 December 2001, Leandro Guimar?es Faria Corsetti Dutra wrote: > My company is currently using CVS to manage some third-party vendor > really big, big tree with really many, many very big, big files. > > The result, obviously, is totally unacceptable. Even one of this > files may take something like half an hour to check out, and that's > for "just" around 20 MB. > > I've been investigating the Web for a (free software) alternative, but > up to now found none. > > So the question is... is there in development for CVS any solution for > this problem? Or do anyone here faced a similar problem *and* has > found a reasonable solution? BTW, I only need versioning, not > merging.
SubVersion looks promising, although it's not release quality yet. It aims to be a better and complete CVS replacement. http://subversion.tigris.org/ Next milestone (0.8) is due today... PS. I'm in no way involved with the project, so please don't think it's an advertisement of some kind. -- "The Universe doesn't give you any points for doing things that are easy." -- Sheridan to Garibaldi in Babylon 5:"The Geometry of Shadows" Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rathann(at)we.are.one.pl> _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
