This is kind of a "how long is a piece of string" question.
I would feel comfortable reccomending Linux over NT simply because I have used Linux as a CVS server in a heterogeneous environment (Win*, Mac*, Solaris and Linux) and it has worked like a charm. As to the cost, it depends ... As to how long, it depends ... Sounds like if you can afford a consultant, it would be well worth the money. Regards G vincent_choplin wrote: >I everyone. > >I work in a small but still growing company and we're beginning to >need something like CVS... > >the problem is that nobody here has ever used CVS (nor any of its >pairs) and one person only (me) is familiar with VSS, on user side >only. > >I would really appreciate you giving me an approximation of the time >it would take to install (and get rid of every problem) and get to >know CVS, knowing that we're 5-6 developpers working under windows >NT4 to 2000. Is it worth hiring a temp. or consultant to install and >teach us? > >would we have to stop working while we put CVS up or can one of us do >it while the others go on with the developpement? > >Is it really better to use linux on the server or are the winNT >versions good enough? > >Thanks a lot in advance. > >Vincent Choplin > > >_______________________________________________ >Info-cvs mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs > _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
