Thomas Eliassson writes: > > This also means that it's perfectly ok (even preferred) for new files to > be numbered with 1.1, as long as I can still track files from before we > had CVS. I also checked that this is the way it works (at least with our > CVS setup), so if one file in the directory has rev. 2.6, a newly added > file will have rev.no. 1.1.
No, that isn't the way it works. If the highest existing rev. no. in the directory is 2.6, a newly added file will have rev. 2.1. -Larry Jones In my opinion, we don't devote nearly enough scientific research to finding a cure for jerks. -- Calvin _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
