In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alleman, Lowell wrote: >> >3. What other problems can I expect? >> >> - When files move in or out of Attic directories, symlinks break. This >> happens when files are removed on the main trunk, or added on a branch >> and then commited to the main trunk. >> >> - When a file is removed (via cvs remove), then every symlink pointing >> to it appears removed; it's necessary to manually break the symlink >> before doing a cvs remove. Breaking the link meaning that the object >> to be removed is an actual object, and not a link, and has no links >> pointing at it. >> >> - Older versions of CVS didn't handle symlinks right; they did not >> chase the link and acquire locks in the right places. this was >> fixed around 1.10.3. >> >Are you talking about symlinking files or symlinking directories? It sounds
I was mistakenly talking about symlinking files. >like your talking about symlinking files, which I am not trying to do. I'm >just interested in symlinking directories. Right. Too bad Usenet article cancelation doesn't propagate well into lists? Ah well, at least you are forewarned about file symlinking. :) _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
