In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Walsh, Matthew wrote: >What I want is: > >cvs co -rTAG module >cvs update -rBRANCH > >without losing anything out of my sandbox that isn't BRANCHed.
I'd love to tell you that the branched/non-branched mixing you are doing is a poor idea CM, but then I suspect you'd probably tell me that my viewpoint is rather naive, and that people all over do this with superior, proprietary tools. -- Meta-CVS: version control with directory structure versioning over top of CVS. http://users.footprints.net/~kaz/mcvs.html _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
