[ On Saturday, February 23, 2002 at 06:25:13 (-0800), Noel Yap wrote: ]
> Subject: Re: refactoring when using CVS
>
> > $ wc -l $(find . \( -name CVS -prune \) -o -type f -print)
> > ksh: wc: Argument list too long
>
> If you'd read anything I posted, you'd know that the
> number of lines of code is irrelevant. What is
> relevant is the number of files.
And if you had even a glimmer of an understanding of what I actually
demonstrate above you'd know that the *BSD kernel contains more
filenames than will fit on a *BSD command line, which is 2**18 bytes and
even with an average of up to 16 chars in a filename that's still one
heck of a lot of files. And that's in the kernel alone.
> > Refactoring (at any level) does not _require_
> > renaming files!!!!
>
> It requires being able to rename files when you're
> programming in Java.
That's an IDE issue with Java programming, not a language issue.
> > Now except for the "Fix XP when it breaks" rule
> > there's the other rule
> > about changing the pairing frequently.... ;-)
>
> This is even more of a reason why it's extremely
> unlikely open source development uses XP.
How do you know they didn't "Fix XP when it broke for them"!?!?!?!?
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Planix, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
