--- "Greg A. Woods" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You're still thinking with the mindset of a > feature-ware developer.
No, my mindset, as if it weren't clear by now, is that CVS is broken -- it doesn't handle concurrent development under this situation. > So you're not willing to follow a very simple and > clearly documented > procedure for something you do so infrequently that > it wouldn't even > show up in a bell curve of functions used in your > tools, let alone an > unadjusted count? Your "very simple and clearly documented procedure is broken". One would need to serialise development while doing it and it doesn't handle multiple renames within one change set. Noel __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games http://sports.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
