--- "Greg A. Woods" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [ On Saturday, February 23, 2002 at 06:37:35 > (-0800), Noel Yap wrote: ] > > Subject: Re: CVS Update Behaviour > > > > Because the tool is broken under such > circumstances. > > It's broken because it claims to be concurrent, > but > > under such circumstances, it's not. > > Huh? What can concurrent editing of the same file > on the same branch > possibly ever have to do with renaming a file on one > branch but not on > another? You've really lost it now Noel.
Let me explain so even you can understand: Developer A should be able to modify a file while developer B renames it. The merge should go gracefully and seemlessly regardless of who checked in first since there is no conflict. But this isn't true when using CVS. Noel __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games http://sports.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
