Hey - Can you guys take this offline?
thanks! donald On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 11:37:10AM -0500, Greg A. Woods wrote: > [ On Tuesday, February 26, 2002 at 23:51:29 (-0800), Paul Sander wrote: ] > > Subject: Re: CVS Update Behaviour > > > > My point was that very few programmers, including the seasoned toolsmiths > > who read this list, know and regularly use all of the tools at their > > disposal. > > Then you have confirmed that your point is irrelevant, just as I said it was. > > > Yes, some of the tools I listed are nearly worthless (or at > > least have better alternatives). And in my world, "patch" also falls > > into that category. (I don't know why Greg seems to have a problem with > > this fact.) > > I have no problem with the fact you consider 'patch' to be useless for > your needs. I do have a very major problem with the fact that you don't > have any alternative that's better for your needs. This is clearly why > you've had so much problems with file renames. Clearly you should be > using 'patch' (or desparately trying to find something equally capable) > because it solves problems you've apparently left un-solved and which > you've continually whined and moaned about in this forum for literally > years now. > > -- > Greg A. Woods > > +1 416 218-0098; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Planix, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > _______________________________________________ > Info-cvs mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
