"Greg A. Woods" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > [ On Monday, March 11, 2002 at 21:22:44 (-0500), Matthew Persico wrote: ] > > Subject: CVS - import to 1.1
[snip] > If they're too opposed to working together and using concurrent edits > and merging then why use CVS in the first place? There are (many) > alternatives. Because the current system sucks (PVCS) and I don't have to put a PO in for CVS. :-) [snip] > > If I cannot do this, then I have to create an empty project and then write a > > script that will recurse a tree of code, doing cvs adds as appropriate and > > I'd rather not do that. > > What's so hard about that? I know it would be nice to have such support > -- so well that I even wrote a full in-depth proposal for it -- but in > the mean time, and especially for the initial creation of projects, a > wee tiny script that is simple enough to write once directly on the > command line should not be a problem. After I wrote this, I thought about it for a second and you are right, it is easy enough. AAMOF, I have set of code that is going to be cvs'ed using a copy of the lib/perl5 tree from production since that's the best source for it (ouch!). To make that work, I'm going to have to do a tree walk anyway so... > > -- > Greg A. Woods > > +1 416 218-0098; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Planix, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
