All I can say is, that's a very good question. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Greg A. Woods > Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 3:51 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: CVS-II Discussion Mailing List > Subject: Re: lock-modify-unlock model and cvs admin -l > > > [ On Friday, March 22, 2002 at 09:46:35 (-0500), John Lippiello wrote: ] > > Subject: lock-modify-unlock model and cvs admin -l > > > > My company uses the lock-modify-unlock model of software > > development. We are considering moving to CVS. I see in > > the Cederqvist document in Sec. A.6.1 that there is a way > > to lock using "cvs admin -l". > > Why would you consider using a tool that is explicitly designed to force > the copy-edit-merge model of development if you're not willing to > embrace that model? > > -- > > Greg A. Woods > > +1 416 218-0098; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Planix, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > _______________________________________________ > Info-cvs mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs > >
_______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
