> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > >> Has anyone taken a look at arch? I saw an announcement about it, > >> but nothing more. It is an improvement over cvs and subversion. > >> > > Do you have any sort of URL? "arch" isn't something that lends > > itself to a Google search, so I don't really know where to find > > it. > > http://www.regexps.com/ but the arch area is unavailable right now. > Thank you, but in that case I wouldn't describe it as an improvement, since both CVS and subversion have at least a presence, and are available. I currently don't consider subversion as an improvement over CVS, since I trust CVS as I can download it today far more than subversion as I can download it today. I will keep an eye on that URL, though.
David H. Thornley | If you want my opinion, ask. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | If you don't, flee. http://www.thornley.net/~thornley/david/ | O- _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
