Greg A. Woods writes: > > We do normally want the the log message for rel-tag-n+1 if, but only if, > it's on a different revision from rel-tag-n; and that's not how the > current development version works, yet.
Yes it is. -Larry Jones Temporary insanity! That's all it was! -- Calvin _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
