[ On Wednesday, May 1, 2002 at 00:04:39 (+0200), Peter Ring wrote: ]
> Subject: RE: merge mode for XML
>
> SGML and XML files are really just serialized representations
> of parse trees, infosets, and an infoset can be serialized in
> many equivalent ways.
Hmmm.... it's just that they have the most horrid syntax.... It's
really too bad, but after all these years that's one heck of a herd of
elephants to try and turn on the head of a pin.... :-)
> So diff'ing XML and SGML alike need a
> validating parser, i.e. one that uses a schema such as a DTD.
Yes -- that's what I thought...
> <rant>There's a class of simple XML documents that live and
> die without getting near either a DTD or revision control.
> Without a schema and accompanying documentation, there's no
> way to tell the semantics of the XML document, and not much
> point in version management.</rant>
Amen. I couldn't agree more!
Those who dare call such things "XML" are sadly mistaken.
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Planix, Inc. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
