Eric Siegerman writes: > > That would depend on how compelling were the reasons for the > change in the first place; I can't speak to that, so I remain > agnostic as to which approach is to be preferred. The bug has > been known for some time, and CVS hasn't been reverted yet, so I > think that suggests which way the current maintainers are > leaning. I trust they have their reasons :-)
Beware of interpreting silence. When the maintainers don't comment, it's usually because they haven't any firm opinion one way or the other and lack the time and/or inclination to investigate the issue. -Larry Jones I'm so disappointed. -- Calvin _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
