Mike Ayers writes: > > In any case, as best I understand it > (just tried to do some fact checking, but my key book is buried), > accepting a KEEPALIVE option, but not actually performing keepalive > may be (interpreted as) valid behavior.
It may be vaild, but it's certainly unfriendly. If you're not going to support it, the least you can do is admit that you're not supporting it by not accepting the option rather than accepting it and then ignoring it. -Larry Jones When you're SERIOUS about having fun, it's not much fun at all! -- Calvin _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
