On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 02:01:36PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote: > [ On Monday, October 7, 2002 at 12:39:29 (-0400), Larry Jones wrote: ] > > Anyone who does an rtag without specifying an explicit revision to tag > > gets exactly what they deserve. > > This part I sort of agree with, though strictly to say such a thing > you'd have to force them to never tag against the head of a branch with > rtag.
By default anyway. Users should probably be allowed to force the issue. Too bad "cvs rtag -[fF]" are both taken :-) -- | | /\ |-_|/ > Eric Siegerman, Toronto, Ont. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | / The acronym for "the powers that be" differs by only one letter from that for "the pointy-haired boss". _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
