Well, off the top of my head I can think of at least a couple of situations where the ability to go back to old directory structures isn't terribly important, but it is important to be able to go back and look at the history of the actual associated files using standard cvs mechanisms. It's all about the individual people involved assaying the risk associated with moving directories around within cvs. The major risk for moving directories around is the inability to build old releases.
donald On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 11:09:10AM -0700, Kaz Kylheku wrote: > Donald Sharp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > yes it's possible, but you will probably loose the ability to > > do old builds, if that is not terribly important go ahead and > > lock the repository and move the directories around. > > If it's not terribly important to ``do'' old builds, then why do you > bother with a version control system? You can back up your sources > regularly with archiving programs like tar or cpio, if that's all you > need. > _______________________________________________ > Info-cvs mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs _______________________________________________ Info-cvs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
